Revealing past ocean circulation with neodymium isotopes
Blaser P, Frank M & van de Flierdt T
Past Global Changes Magazine
Patrick Blaser1, M. Frank2 and T. van de Flierdt3
The dissolved neodymium isotope composition of seawater is widely used to study past changes in provenance and mixing of different water masses in the ocean. We discuss mechanisms controlling signal formation and preservation, proxy strengths, and current challenges.
The samarium-neodymium (Nd) decay system has been widely used to determine the age of crustal rocks and the provenance of detrital sediments. However, the dissolved radiogenic isotope composition of Nd (expressed as εNd = [(143Nd/144Nd)/0.512638 – 1] × 104) in seawater also traces the distribution of major water masses and their mixing. This is the foundation for using Nd isotopes as a tracer for ocean circulation (van de Flierdt et al. 2016).
Disentangling ocean circulation from carbon storage
For decades, the reconstruction of past ocean circulation relied on the stable isotope composition of the nutrient component carbon (C) in marine calcareous organisms (13C/12C ratio expressed as δ13C; Fig. 1). However, both biological cycling and ocean circulation play major roles in setting the measured δ13C signature. In contrast, the lithogenic element Nd is not actively involved in marine biological cycling. Recorded in and extracted from oceanic archives, radiogenic Nd isotopes fingerprint where a water mass acquired its Nd isotope signature. Thus, the combination of Nd and C isotopes in oceanic archives allows us to disentangle deep ocean circulation from carbon storage under past climatic conditions and becomes more valuable than the sum of its parts.
For example, Piotrowski et al. (2005) combined Nd, oxygen, and carbon isotopes from a high sedimentation site in the South Atlantic to show that glacial-interglacial transitions first manifested themselves in changes in ice sheets, followed by ocean carbon storage, and finally ocean circulation. Pena and Goldstein (2014) extended the εNd record across the mid Pleistocene and found that Atlantic meridional overturning skipped a beat during interglacial marine isotope stage 23 (approximately 900 kyr BP), increasing carbon sequestration and thereby promoting ice-sheet build-up and setting the stage for the mid-Pleistocene transition. During this period, glacial cycles switched from a 41 kyr periodicity to one of 100 kyr (see also Farmer et al. this issue). For the Last Glacial Maximum, Howe et al. (2016a) compiled Atlantic εNd data suggesting that southern sourced water was less prevalent than inferred from carbon isotopes. This implies that biological cycling must have played a greater role than previously thought. These examples demonstrate the value of seawater derived εNd as a water-mass proxy in the paleoceanographer’s toolbox.
What determines the seawater Nd isotope signal?
Lithogenic in origin, dissolved Nd is introduced into surface waters by erosion and weathering of continental crust. Hence, water masses typically acquire their Nd isotope fingerprint at the interface with continents. Subsequently, convection leads to the export of these characteristic εNd signatures to deep waters (Fig. 1).
The mean residence time of Nd in the deep oceans is on the order of centuries, and is thus similar to the mean ocean overturning time. This similarity of time constants is the decisive factor rendering εNd a suitable tracer for ocean water masses. Hence, εNd behaves largely conservatively away from ocean margins (no significant sources or sinks), with measured signatures primarily reflecting the mixture of distinct water masses transported across ocean basins (Fig. 2a). On regional and local scales, however, geochemical processes can modulate the residence time of Nd dissolved in seawater.
The concentration of dissolved Nd generally increases with water depth, indicating a combined control of advection and vertical transport via adsorption and desorption from particles. This can transfer Nd vertically through the water column and across water-mass boundaries. At the ocean bottom, fluxes of Nd across the sediment-seawater interface have been observed both into and out of bottom waters (Haley et al. 2017). In general, such benthic exchange depends on the reactivity of detrital material releasing Nd in the sediment. Exchange may also be facilitated within benthic nepheloid layers through the availability of large particle surface areas (van de Flierdt et al. 2016).
Geochemical processes are not necessarily restricted to regions where water masses are formed and their end-member characteristics are defined. Therefore, a non-conservative element is added to the distribution of εNd in seawater. Ultimately, it is the balance of physical water-mass advection (conservative component) and geochemical processes (non-conservative component) that determines the residence time of dissolved Nd in seawater and whether its isotope composition primarily reflects water-mass mixing. In environments in which exchange processes lead to faster replacement of Nd than water-mass transit, εNd may even be applicable as a kinematic proxy, as Du et al. (2018) suggested for the North Pacific.
What do the archives tell us?
Marine archives record the local Nd isotope signatures of water-mass mixtures. The extraction of unaltered past seawater εNd is challenging but has been achieved from fossil fish debris, deep-sea coral skeletons, and ferromanganese deposits in the form of crusts, nodules, and coatings on bulk sediment particles and inside foraminiferal calcite tests (Fig. 2a).
However, the early diagenetic archiving process is currently not well understood and in some regions all attempts to extract local bottom water εNd from core-top sediments have failed (see gray indicated regions in Fig. 2a). The archiving processes comprise co-precipitation of Nd with iron-manganese oxyhydroxides, diffusion into biogenic apatite, and the precipitation in microbially mediated microenvironments. Hence, for sedimentary εNd signatures, one possible explanation for discrepancies compared to seawater εNd is that a pore-water signal is recorded, which itself can reflect a mixture of bottom water and detrital εNd. Pore waters and sedimentary authigenic phases could thus carry additional information about the strength of past benthic exchange (Du et al. 2016).
Improving Nd isotope-based reconstructions of water masses
Mechanisms and magnitudes of Nd supply to the oceans via particles, reactive sediments, or in dissolved form can vary as a function of climatically controlled parameters such as precipitation or ice and vegetation cover on the continents. Thus, the accuracy of εNd as a paleo water-mass proxy often depends on the knowledge of past end-member characteristics (Fig. 2b; Howe et al. 2016a; Pöppelmeier et al. 2018), the impact of non-conservative processes (Blaser et al. 2019), and the fidelity of the archive and extraction method used (Blaser et al. 2016; Du et al. 2016).
Paleoceanographic reconstructions from settings with little input of reactive detritus and expected large water mass fluxes will be least affected by such uncertainties, and interpretations will ideally be based on εNd gradients between different sites. Better data coverage within and near regions of significant benthic exchange and end-member formation, as well as incorporation of Nd concentrations and εNd in ocean circulation models will be important steps to gain deeper insights into past oceanic Nd cycling and water mass circulation. The combination of several tracers can eliminate uncertainties of individual proxies. At the same time a better understanding of present-day Nd cycling through measurements along ocean sections and dedicated process studies at key locations, currently performed as part of the international GEOTRACES program (), will increase the reliability of interpretations based on Nd isotopes.
1Institute of Earth Sciences, Heidelberg University, Germany
2GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
3Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, UK